<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Split Testing Adwords: You&#039;re Doing It Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong</link>
	<description>Frustrated by the often-confusing and conflicting SEO advice you find on the web? The best SEO book is free - stop searching and download it today!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:48:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brent Crouch</title>
		<link>http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong/comment-page-2#comment-56768</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Crouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 13:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong#comment-56768</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan,

Quick question.  Have you ever performed any tests to verify if there was any connection between Google Adwords and Google Organic?  I&#039;ve always heard there wasn&#039;t and it&#039;s obvious you don&#039;t have to pay for Adwords to get good organic listings on Google, but something I seen this month made me question if there is some connection.

I have a site that has ranked #5 organically for a dvd related term for several years.  In addition to organic, I&#039;ve always used Adwords to drive traffic to the site as well.

Last week, I increased my Adwords bid for this term to test a new landing page.  Within a few days, my #5 listing shot to #1 and remained there for about a week.  It eventually settled back down to #5 where it had previously been.

Coincidence or is there some relation between the two?

Thanks,

Brent Crouch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan,</p>
<p>Quick question.  Have you ever performed any tests to verify if there was any connection between Google Adwords and Google Organic?  I&#039;ve always heard there wasn&#039;t and it&#039;s obvious you don&#039;t have to pay for Adwords to get good organic listings on Google, but something I seen this month made me question if there is some connection.</p>
<p>I have a site that has ranked #5 organically for a dvd related term for several years.  In addition to organic, I&#039;ve always used Adwords to drive traffic to the site as well.</p>
<p>Last week, I increased my Adwords bid for this term to test a new landing page.  Within a few days, my #5 listing shot to #1 and remained there for about a week.  It eventually settled back down to #5 where it had previously been.</p>
<p>Coincidence or is there some relation between the two?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Brent Crouch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Thies</title>
		<link>http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong/comment-page-2#comment-52642</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Thies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong#comment-52642</guid>
		<description>@Peter, Sorry about missing that. I&#039;ve never seen that happen before, in any campaigns. Sounds like a question for Adwords support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter, Sorry about missing that. I&#039;ve never seen that happen before, in any campaigns. Sounds like a question for Adwords support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter (IMC)</title>
		<link>http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong/comment-page-2#comment-52629</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter (IMC)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong#comment-52629</guid>
		<description>Dan,

You forgot to reply to my question (about 7 posts up). Can you give it a try?

Thanks,
Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>You forgot to reply to my question (about 7 posts up). Can you give it a try?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong/comment-page-2#comment-52514</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong#comment-52514</guid>
		<description>@brentCrouch 

It wasn&#039;t until the last post of this gigantic page that I understood the value of this test. Your two paragraphs summed up the whole dang thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@brentCrouch </p>
<p>It wasn&#039;t until the last post of this gigantic page that I understood the value of this test. Your two paragraphs summed up the whole dang thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Crouch</title>
		<link>http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong/comment-page-2#comment-50652</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Crouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong#comment-50652</guid>
		<description>@Flaming Monkey - You&#039;ve obviously missed the point.  This strategy is simple yet works brilliantly.  

I had a few ads that were getting a great CTR and were converting very well.  I stopped testing them because I didn&#039;t want to waste 50% of my impressions on an ad that had a small chance of beating my control.  

This strategy lets me control what percentage of my impressions I use to test an ad that will probably not beat my control.  Sure, I could split the impressions 50% control and 50% test ad and get quicker results, but why waste 50% of my impressions and potential profits on an ad with no history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Flaming Monkey &#8211; You&#039;ve obviously missed the point.  This strategy is simple yet works brilliantly.  </p>
<p>I had a few ads that were getting a great CTR and were converting very well.  I stopped testing them because I didn&#039;t want to waste 50% of my impressions on an ad that had a small chance of beating my control.  </p>
<p>This strategy lets me control what percentage of my impressions I use to test an ad that will probably not beat my control.  Sure, I could split the impressions 50% control and 50% test ad and get quicker results, but why waste 50% of my impressions and potential profits on an ad with no history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Thies</title>
		<link>http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong/comment-page-2#comment-50644</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Thies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong#comment-50644</guid>
		<description>Flaming Monkey,

You keep doing that then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flaming Monkey,</p>
<p>You keep doing that then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flaming Monkey Nostrils</title>
		<link>http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong/comment-page-2#comment-47542</link>
		<dc:creator>Flaming Monkey Nostrils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong#comment-47542</guid>
		<description>Umm, I beg to differ regarding the point you make that doing a test with just 2 ads will eat up profits. Whether I am running it that way, or running 10 ad groups, I will still need X number of impressions/clicks to have valid results.  And if that happens in 1 day or 1 month, I would rather have it done in a day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, I beg to differ regarding the point you make that doing a test with just 2 ads will eat up profits. Whether I am running it that way, or running 10 ad groups, I will still need X number of impressions/clicks to have valid results.  And if that happens in 1 day or 1 month, I would rather have it done in a day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong/comment-page-2#comment-45743</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong#comment-45743</guid>
		<description>Hey, am I the only one wondering about PPC Fast Start, or am I the only one who doesn&#039;t know how to get hold of it :-)

Dan, maybe the PPC Fast Start will answer this but I&#039;ve been thinking long and hard about your advice for starting new AdWords campaigns, using exact match, and I just can&#039;t seem to completely get my head round it.

You say that you use exact match until you find profitable keywords but if you start so focused how do you know what people are searching for? I can only imagine that your keyword list is really, really long to account for every combination of keyword on the off-chance that some will prove profitable. I&#039;m sure you use a few tools (AdWords keyword tool, etc) first to find some ideas, so is that how you go about it?

I&#039;m aware that if you start with phrase match you should really know which negative keywords to include, and that broad match can cost you in wasted clicks, but am I missing some fundamental point about exact match that I&#039;ve not just covered? There are so many opinions out there on how to start new campaigns...

Many thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, am I the only one wondering about PPC Fast Start, or am I the only one who doesn&#039;t know how to get hold of it <img src='http://www.seofaststart.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Dan, maybe the PPC Fast Start will answer this but I&#039;ve been thinking long and hard about your advice for starting new AdWords campaigns, using exact match, and I just can&#039;t seem to completely get my head round it.</p>
<p>You say that you use exact match until you find profitable keywords but if you start so focused how do you know what people are searching for? I can only imagine that your keyword list is really, really long to account for every combination of keyword on the off-chance that some will prove profitable. I&#039;m sure you use a few tools (AdWords keyword tool, etc) first to find some ideas, so is that how you go about it?</p>
<p>I&#039;m aware that if you start with phrase match you should really know which negative keywords to include, and that broad match can cost you in wasted clicks, but am I missing some fundamental point about exact match that I&#039;ve not just covered? There are so many opinions out there on how to start new campaigns&#8230;</p>
<p>Many thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Crouch</title>
		<link>http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong/comment-page-2#comment-45671</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Crouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong#comment-45671</guid>
		<description>Awesome technique!

I go through my PPC accounts every two weeks to monitor performance and setup new test ads.  I&#039;ve been at this for a few years now, so I&#039;ve come up with some pretty good control ads.  

This weekend I was considering not even testing anymore ads in the account.  Like you said, most of the time the test ad will not beat the control and I have found I am loosing clicks/conversions to these tests.

I was curious to see if there was a solution and have been searching for the last few hours on different testing techniques.  I finally made it to your post and it makes more sense that anything I&#039;ve seen.  It&#039;s a great idea.

See ya.  I&#039;ve got work to do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome technique!</p>
<p>I go through my PPC accounts every two weeks to monitor performance and setup new test ads.  I&#039;ve been at this for a few years now, so I&#039;ve come up with some pretty good control ads.  </p>
<p>This weekend I was considering not even testing anymore ads in the account.  Like you said, most of the time the test ad will not beat the control and I have found I am loosing clicks/conversions to these tests.</p>
<p>I was curious to see if there was a solution and have been searching for the last few hours on different testing techniques.  I finally made it to your post and it makes more sense that anything I&#039;ve seen.  It&#039;s a great idea.</p>
<p>See ya.  I&#039;ve got work to do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter (IMC)</title>
		<link>http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong/comment-page-2#comment-44970</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter (IMC)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/split-testing-adwords-youre-doing-it-wrong#comment-44970</guid>
		<description>Dan,

Great post, but I&#039;m having some problems with split testing. I recently did a split test with 1 original add, 2 copies of the original, and 1 new ad I wanted to improve.

Worked great! My new copy doubled the CTR, from 2.25% to 4.5%. So I paused the original and its 2 copies and left the new ad run on its own.

That was a bad choice. Positions dropped a bit and CTR to 0 (after over 600 impressions.)

When I switched the other ads on again, the clicks started again too,.. also on the new ad.

Is the history of the ads some kind of average of all active ads? What&#039;s your experience?

Thanks,
Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>Great post, but I&#039;m having some problems with split testing. I recently did a split test with 1 original add, 2 copies of the original, and 1 new ad I wanted to improve.</p>
<p>Worked great! My new copy doubled the CTR, from 2.25% to 4.5%. So I paused the original and its 2 copies and left the new ad run on its own.</p>
<p>That was a bad choice. Positions dropped a bit and CTR to 0 (after over 600 impressions.)</p>
<p>When I switched the other ads on again, the clicks started again too,.. also on the new ad.</p>
<p>Is the history of the ads some kind of average of all active ads? What&#039;s your experience?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
